If we analyze
the Pakistani society as a case study, we find them divided into different
political sects, inspired by ideologies, manifestos or proper to say, slogans
of different parties. They are affiliated with their political parties more sentimentally
than politically. Their unconditional and questionable loyalty to their
respective political parties and leaderships is a surprising phenomenon. We
find that in every election, some active members of the political parties get
killed in mutual conflicts and scuffles. In this article, we try to analyze the
political behavior of the Pakistani society with respect to some of their most
peculiar features in the light of the theory propounded by renowned
anthropologist Mr. Abraham Maslow (1908–1970). This theory
well explains the factors which build up such behaviour.
Abraham Maslow presented a model of the hierarchy of human needs. According to
this model, man chooses to behave in a certain way under the influence of five basic
needs. These needs emerge in order. One comes to the fore after the gratification
of the preceding need. The hierarchy of needs occurs in the following order:
1. Physiological needs (food and drink)
2. Safety needs (security, shelter)
3. Love need (need of family, friends, etc.)
4. Esteem needs (self respect, honour)
5. The need for self actualization, (realization of one’s
distinct abilities or identity etc.)
Maslow writes:
Human needs
arrange themselves in hierarchies of pre-potency. That is to say, the
appearance of one need usually rests on the prior satisfaction of another, more
pre-potent need. Man is a perpetually wanting animal. Also, no need or drive
can be treated as if it were isolated or discrete; every drive is related to
the state of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of other drives. (Maslow, A. H. “A Theory of Human Motivation”. Psychological
Review, Vol. 50 (4), Jul 1943, 370-396. 370. Do: 10.1037/h0054346)
It means that
unless the physiological needs are fulfilled, other needs are not fully
realized. We see, for example, that the starving individuals get ready to
sacrifice their lives to get a little food and drink. Even they do not hesitate
to kill others for that. It is only after the gratification of physiological
needs that an individual feels need for safety, security and shelter. Love need
comes at the third place. Love in hunger and insecurity feels cumbersome. It
gives its true colour when the first two needs are fulfilled. We notice that
individual get ready to sacrifice or compromise their need of self-esteem
(fourth in the hierarchy of needs) to earn bread, to achieve security, and to
win or to save their love. In other words, self esteem need is subservient to
the preceding three needs. A man’s esteem need comes to the fore only when the
first three are gratified; only then, he gets ready to fight for his honour. In
this model of hierarchy of need, the need of self actualization comes at the
last when all the other needs are fulfilled. An individual, after gratification
of his all four needs, starts to feel free to peruse his ambitions or goals to
make himself and the world realize, how distinct he is in his person and
abilities.
However, this
order of needs may be disturbed for the involvement of certain factors for some
individuals. This is discussed in detail in the works of Maslow; one can
consult for the complete comprehension of his theory. Our concern, here, is to
see what guidance, this theory of the hierarchy of needs gives us to understand
the political behaviour of our society.
In this model
of hierarchy of needs, the physiological need comes first. The Pakistani society,
despite being an agricultural country of fertile lands and water, suffers from
utter poverty. Over half of its population lives under the line of poverty. Their
basic physiological needs go unfulfilled. So, we find in the history of
politics of Pakistan that the first breakthrough under the political hegemony
of the Pakistan Muslim League was made by the emergence of the Pakistan
People’s Party with the help of its slogan, Rōtī, Kapṛā or Makān Māng Rahā hay Har Insān, (Bread, Cloth and Shelter are the
demands of every man). It succeeded to turn around the favour of the people,
who were otherwise loyal voters of the Pakistan Muslim League, the founder
party of Pakistan. This slogan drove the nail aright. It directly addressed the
physiological need of the poor Pakistani society. This was an apt slogan,
invented after studying the Pakistani society. However, ironically, after
scores of years wasted, the same demands are still unfulfilled and the slogan is
still alive and attracts the poor people with the same enthusiasm. Poor need this slogan, but this slogan needs
poor, too. Both are the allies to each other and both seem to remain alive for
each other.
We observe that
the proponents of this political slogan, after coming into power, got interested
in meeting mainly those needs, which mattered them, i.e., the esteem need, the safety
need and the need of self actualization, which come later in the hierarchy of
needs. We see that they got busy in the making of the atomic bomb (safety
need), and making a Muslim bloc (esteem need, self actualization) and dealing
with religious conflicts (self actualization). The rulers paid little attention
to the alleviation of poverty, which was the hallmark of their election campaign.
This was because the physiological needs were not a personal problem of the
elite class, from which the rulers belonged. They were gratifying their own
needs.
Same attitude
goes with the Pakistan Muslim League (N). It comes into power with the slogans,
which address the basic needs of the people, for example, to provide them cheap
bread, drinking water, employment, business facilitation, to end the power
shortage within months (all belong to physiological needs) and to end the terrorism (safety need, second in the
hierarchy). The people go crazy after these slogans and promises. We find the
voters of this party in the seventh heaven during the election campaign, believing
and making others believe in the promises of their leaders. But as soon as, their leaders come into power,
their prior concern is observed to construct roads and transport. While their
actual slogans of employments, facilitation for business, etc., go into the
backdrop. Why do they love to build roads and transport? The answer is because
it matters them. These activities belong to their personal business and their business
community (source of their physiological need), moreover, these activities satisfy
their need of self actualization, when they see concrete buildings, their names
engraved on them, and they feel that they have made their names lasting
forever, as did Shāh Jahān, the Mughal
ruler, who built Tāj Maḥal to commemorate himself (Self actualization). While, what concerns the poor people
comes later in the hierarchy of their own priorities.
PTI is the third
trend setter in the Pakistani politics. The PTI’s agenda of changing the system
and to bring social justice falls in the category of self esteem which comes at
the fourth place in the model of the hierarchy of needs. A nation groping for
basic needs is not easy to realize that the solution of their problem lies in
social justice and not just in the superficial measures to fulfill their basic
needs. I make the point clear with an example. It is a common phenomenon that
employees often forebear and tolerate the disgrace, insult and humiliation
inflicted upon them by their authorities, just to save their job, which belongs
to their most basic physiological need. But, if some person is secured in his
physiological needs, he seldom tolerates any disgrace to his self esteem and
honour. The same goes with the psychology of Pakistani nation. They are more
concerned about their physiological needs; it was not easy to make them realize
that the problem of their solution lies in the fulfillment of a need (justice)
which comes later in the hierarchy of needs (self esteem).
We observe that
it took PTI almost 18 years to make a sizeable portion of the Pakistani society
realize the importance of their agenda, but, still the overwhelming majority of
their voters belong to the well to do classes of the Pakistani society, whose
do not have to deal with the problem of physiological and safety needs. Their
concern, now, is to save their self respect (esteem need).
Maslow’s theory
goes with natural human instinct. Instinct and logic seldom go with each other.
For example, if you have got a peculiar fear of darkness or loneliness, you
feel that despite your logical arguments regarding the baselessness of your
fear, you find yourself unable to eliminate the element of fear from your
psychology. And if a little noise produces while you are in darkness or alone,
you feel panic. The same goes with the people of Pakistan. Their physiological
needs are not fulfilled, moreover, they are facing problem of security need,
too, due to the terrorist activities, so, they are a prey to two basic needs,
which come first in the hierarchy of needs, therefore, their instinct inclines
towards the slogans and promises of the leaders that address their
physiological and security needs, even if the people logically understand that
the permanent solution of their problems does not lie there. This is what it
is.
No comments:
Post a Comment